- Follow Shameless Orthodoxy on WordPress.com
Tags
- apocatastasis
- apokatastasis
- apologetics
- Catholicism
- Chalcedon
- Church History
- Colin McGinn
- conciliar fundamentalism
- Constantinople (553)
- Council of Jerusalem (1672)
- Craig Truglia
- David Bentley Hart
- divorce
- dualism
- Early Middle Ages
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- ecumenical councils
- empiricism
- Enlightenment
- exegesis
- Fifth Ecumenical Council
- filioque
- Final Fantasy
- Final Fantasy Tactics
- Fourth Ecumenical Council
- gaming
- High Middle Ages
- History
- Ibas of Edessa
- infallibility
- Jay Dyer
- Julien Jean Offray de La Mettrie
- keys
- L'Homme Machine
- Late Antiquity
- marriage
- Materialism
- Matthew 16:18-19
- mind-body problem
- nativism
- Netodoxy
- Nicene Creed
- Orthodoxy
- papacy
- Papal infallibility
- Papal Primacy
- Peter
- philosophy
- philosophy of mind
- pride
- Protestantism
- rationalism
- reason
- remarriage
- Rock
- Roman Catholicism
- Synodikon
- TASBS
- That All Shall Be Saved
- theology
- universalism
- universal salvation
- video games
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
David on Netodoxy & Its Apologists:… Alura on Netodoxy & Its Apologists:… David on Netodoxy & Its Apologists:… Alura on On the Stupidity of Conciliar… Serro Hamilton on On the Stupidity of Conciliar… Top Posts & Pages
Categories
Archives
Meta
Tag Archives: Peter
Upon this Rock: An Addendum
Recently it has come to my attention through criticism that my previous blog post on the Latin exegetical tradition of Matthew 16: 18-19 does not accurately take into account the Catholic Church’s position of Peter as the Rock and the … Continue reading
Was Peter the Rock? Latin Exegetical Interpretations of Matthew 16:18-19: From Late Antiquity to the Twelfth Century
Note: I have since added an addendum to this blog post. Also, I mistook Christian of Stavelot’s work for Dungal of Bobbio’s. I have since made this correction. This post has its origins on Catholic Answers Forums, where once again the … Continue reading
